Post-Close

Purchase Price Allocation After a Business Sale: What Founders Need to Understand

After a business sale closes, the purchase price is allocated across the assets the buyer acquired. That allocation determines how the buyer depreciates and amortizes the business, and it has direct tax consequences for both parties that most founders never think about until after the deal is signed.

Best for:Founders preparing for a saleM&A advisors & bankersPE-backed management teams
Use this perspective to move toward transaction readiness, sale timing, or M&A execution work.

Key takeaways

  • In an asset sale, the buyer and seller must agree on how the purchase price is allocated across asset classes. That allocation is filed jointly with the IRS on Form 8594.
  • Buyers prefer to allocate as much value as possible to depreciable and amortizable assets, which generate tax deductions post-close. Sellers often prefer the opposite.
  • Goodwill is the residual: everything left after tangible assets and identified intangibles are allocated their fair value. Goodwill is amortized over 15 years for the buyer.
  • Identified intangibles, including customer relationships, trade names, non-compete agreements, and technology, are separately valued and amortized over their useful lives.
  • In a stock sale, the buyer does not get a step-up in asset basis unless a Section 338(h)(10) election is made, which changes the tax dynamics significantly for both parties.
Research finding
IRS Section 1060, FASB ASC 805, Deloitte M&A Tax Advisory

15 years

IRS amortization period for goodwill and most Section 197 intangibles

$500K–$2M

Typical identified intangible asset value in a $10M–$20M middle market transaction

Form 8594

Joint IRS filing required when assets of a business are acquired

5–7%

Typical valuation fee for a purchase price allocation analysis

Most founders spend significant time negotiating the headline purchase price and deal structure. Very few spend equivalent time understanding what happens to that purchase price in the accounting and tax treatment that follows. The purchase price allocation, known as PPA, is where the deal structure becomes a tax outcome for both the buyer and the seller.

In an asset sale, the buyer is acquiring individual assets rather than the legal entity. Those assets must be assigned specific values. The total of those assigned values must equal the total consideration paid, including assumed liabilities. How the values are distributed across asset classes determines who gets a tax benefit and when.

The IRS asset class hierarchy

The IRS specifies a mandatory class hierarchy for asset purchase allocations under Section 1060. Purchase price is assigned to each class in order, with any remaining amount going to the next class down, until the full price is allocated.

1

IRS Section 1060 asset class hierarchy

2

Class I: Cash and cash equivalents

Allocated at face value. If the buyer acquires $200K of cash in the transaction, that is the first $200K of the allocation.

3

Class II: Actively traded personal property and certificates of deposit

Marketable securities, foreign currency. Common in some transactions.

4

Class III: Mark-to-market assets and debt instruments

Accounts receivable, loans. AR is typically allocated at net realizable value.

5

Class IV: Inventory

Allocated at cost or fair market value, depending on the inventory method and the nature of the goods.

6

Class V: All other assets (tangible personal property)

Equipment, furniture, fixtures, vehicles. Allocated at fair market value. Buyers prefer higher values here because equipment can be depreciated quickly under bonus depreciation rules.

7

Class VI: Section 197 intangibles other than goodwill

Customer relationships, trade names, non-compete agreements, proprietary technology, licenses. These are amortized over 15 years.

8

Class VII: Goodwill and going concern value

The residual. Everything left after Classes I through VI are assigned their fair values. Also amortized over 15 years.

The allocation is not discretionary. Once each class is assigned fair market value, any excess goes to the next class. A buyer who tries to allocate $3M to equipment when the equipment is worth $1.2M will have a valuation problem with the IRS. The allocation must be supportable by independent appraisal.

Why buyers and sellers have opposing interests in PPA

Buyers want to allocate as much value as possible to assets that generate the largest and fastest tax deductions. Under current bonus depreciation rules, buyers can immediately expense a large percentage of Class V personal property. Class VI intangibles and goodwill amortize over 15 years, which is slower but still generates tax deductions.

Sellers have different interests depending on what they are selling and how it is taxed. For an individual founder selling a C-corporation in an asset sale, the tax treatment by asset class matters significantly.

Asset ClassBuyer PreferenceSeller Concern
Equipment and tangibles (Class V)High value; fast depreciation deductionSeller recaptures depreciation at ordinary income rates on amounts above original cost basis
Customer relationships and non-competes (Class VI)Moderate; 15-year amortizationNon-compete payments are ordinary income to the seller, not capital gains
Goodwill (Class VII)Buyer prefers less hereSeller often prefers more here; goodwill is typically capital gains for an individual seller
Covenant not to compete (embedded in Class VI)Buyer wants value allocated hereSeller wants minimal allocation here; ordinary income treatment

The most common negotiating point is the allocation between personal goodwill and non-compete agreements. A founder who can substantiate personal goodwill, the value attributable to their individual relationships and reputation rather than the business entity, may be able to receive capital gains treatment on that portion even in an asset sale. This requires advance structuring and cannot be improvised at closing.

Working through this yourself?

Kolton works directly with founders on M&A readiness, deal structure, and AI implementation — one advisor, not a team of generalists.

Schedule a conversation →

Identified intangibles: what gets valued and why

Between equipment and goodwill sits the most complex layer of the allocation: identified intangible assets. These are assets that do not have physical form but can be separated from the business and valued independently.

1

Common identified intangibles in middle market transactions

2

Customer relationships

The value attributable to existing customer contracts and the expectation of renewal. Valued using the multi-period excess earnings method. Duration and renewal rates drive the value.

3

Trade name and brand

The value of the company name, logo, and associated customer recognition. Valued using the relief-from-royalty method: what would it cost to license the name from a third party?

4

Proprietary technology or processes

Software, formulas, designs, or processes the company developed that are not separately patented. Valued based on the cost to recreate or the royalty relief approach.

5

Non-compete agreements

The value of the seller's agreement not to compete for a defined period. Valued based on the realistic probability and economic impact of competition.

6

Assembled workforce

The value of having a trained team in place. Not separately amortizable under current rules but factors into overall business value.

In a $15M acquisition of a professional services firm, identified intangibles might include $3.5M of customer relationships, $800K of trade name, and $400K of non-compete value. The remaining $8M after tangible assets might go to goodwill. The buyer amortizes all of it over 15 years; the seller pays different tax rates on each piece.

The Form 8594 filing and negotiation in practice

In an asset sale, both buyer and seller are required to file Form 8594 with the IRS, reporting the same allocation. If the two parties report different allocations, the IRS will notice and may challenge both returns.

In practice, the purchase agreement should include an exhibit that specifies the agreed allocation across asset classes. The allocation is often negotiated as part of the overall transaction structure, with each party's tax counsel involved. Founders who do not have tax counsel reviewing the allocation are relying on the buyer's counsel to protect an interest the buyer's counsel does not represent.

A $500K difference in how goodwill versus non-compete payments are allocated can result in a $75K–$150K difference in after-tax proceeds to the founder at a 23.8% capital gains rate versus a 37% ordinary income rate. This negotiation is worth having. It requires a tax advisor, not just a transaction attorney.

Work with Glacier Lake Partners

Understand the Tax Mechanics Before You Sign

We help founders understand the financial and tax structure of their transaction before they commit.

Start a Conversation

Research sources

IRS: Section 1060 Asset Acquisition RulesFASB ASC 805: Business CombinationsDeloitte: Purchase Price Allocation in M&A

Disclaimer: Financial figures and case studies in this article are illustrative, based on representative middle market assumptions, and are not guarantees of outcome. Statistical references are drawn from cited third-party research; individual transaction and operational results vary based on business characteristics, market conditions, and deal structure. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. Consult qualified advisors for guidance specific to your situation.

Explore adjacent topics

Operational Discipline

Operational discipline is still the fastest path to credibility

AI-Enabled Execution

AI should remove friction, not create a science project

Found this useful?Share on LinkedInShare on X

Next Step

Recognized a situation? A direct conversation is faster.

If a perspective maps to an active transaction, operating, or AI challenge, the right next step is a short discussion — not more reading.

Confidential inquiriesReviewed personally1 business day response target