Key takeaways
- Rollover equity is the most valuable component of the management package for founders who believe in the business, a 10-15% rollover into a 3x exit return delivers more proceeds than most option grants.
- Hurdle rates, preferred returns, and waterfall mechanics can significantly reduce what management actually receives at exit, model the full scenario before negotiating.
- Option vesting typically ties to tenure (time-based) plus performance (EBITDA or revenue milestones); understand what happens to unvested options in a change of control.
- Co-investment rights, the ability to invest additional capital alongside the sponsor at deal pricing, are often more valuable than option grants for founders with capital to deploy.
The components of a PE management package
A PE management package typically has three or four components, each with different risk profiles, liquidity timelines, and economic impact. Most founders entering PE ownership understand the headline rollover percentage but have not modeled how the components interact at exit.
Management Package Components
Scroll to see more →
The interaction between these components matters more than any individual component. A founder who rolls 15% of proceeds, co-invests $1M, and earns a 3x return on the equity value in a second transaction may receive more total consideration from the second exit than from the first.
Waterfall mechanics: how money actually flows at exit
PE equity structures have a distribution waterfall that determines who gets paid first and in what order. Understanding the waterfall is essential for modeling what management actually receives at a second exit.
Most PE structures use a preferred return waterfall: the PE fund receives a preferred return (typically 8% annually) before management equity participates in upside. After the preferred return is satisfied, remaining proceeds are split according to the equity percentages in the ownership structure.
Management equity participation below the hurdle rate is zero. If the PE firm invested $50M for 80% of the equity, and the exit value is $60M at a 5-year hold, the 8% annual preferred return alone may consume most of the upside before management sees any profit on rollover equity. Always model exits at multiple scenarios, 1.5x, 2x, 2.5x, 3x, to understand your actual economic range.
8% annual
typical PE preferred return (hurdle rate)
3-5 years
typical hold period before second exit
0-20%
range of management equity participation at various exit multiples
Option grant mechanics: vesting, exercise, and change of control
Option grants in PE-backed companies are typically structured as profits interests (tax-efficient) or incentive stock options. The key parameters to negotiate and understand are: grant size, exercise price, vesting schedule, and what happens in a change of control.
Vesting schedules in PE typically combine time-based and performance-based conditions. A common structure: 50% of options vest ratably over 4 years of employment; the remaining 50% vest on achievement of EBITDA or revenue milestones. Performance-based vesting ties your incentive directly to the value creation plan.
Change-of-control provisions determine what happens to unvested options if the business is sold before you are fully vested. Single-trigger acceleration (options vest automatically on change of control) is better for management than double-trigger (options vest only if you are also terminated post-close). Negotiate for at least partial single-trigger acceleration on unvested options.
Co-investment: often underutilized, often highly valuable
Co-investment rights give management the ability to invest personal capital into the PE-backed entity at the same price the PE firm paid, effectively allowing management to buy additional equity at deal pricing without paying a premium for control.
If the business was acquired at 7x EBITDA and exits at 11x EBITDA in 5 years, a management co-investor who put in $1M at deal pricing alongside the sponsor receives the same return multiple as the PE firm on that incremental capital. The only risk is that the business underperforms, the same risk borne by all equity holders.
Many founders decline co-investment rights because they are reluctant to put additional capital into a business they just sold. This is often the wrong decision. If you have conviction in the value creation plan and the PE firm has a credible track record, co-investment is frequently the highest-returning use of sale proceeds for founders who believe in the second exit story.
Management co-investment participation correlates positively with alignment of interests and has historically been associated with better value creation plan execution across middle market PE portfolios.
Founders who co-invest alongside their PE sponsor report higher satisfaction with the ownership relationship, partly because both parties bear the same economic risk on incremental capital.
8% annual
typical PE preferred return that must be satisfied before management equity participates
5–20%
typical rollover equity range as % of pre-tax proceeds
3–8%
typical option grant as % of fully diluted equity
$500K–$2M
typical founder co-investment alongside PE at deal pricing
Model your equity economics at 1.5x, 2x, 2.5x, and 3x MOIC before you accept the package terms. Management equity participation below the hurdle rate is zero. A deal that returns 1.5x after fees and preferred return may deliver far less to management than the gross headline suggests. Know your number at every scenario before you sign.
Co-investment is often the most underutilized component of a PE management package. Founders who believe in the second exit story and have capital to deploy after the first liquidity event often generate better risk-adjusted returns by co-investing alongside the sponsor than by putting the same capital into diversified public markets.
Work with Glacier Lake Partners
Get help understanding your management package terms
We help management teams model their equity economics and understand how package terms interact with exit scenarios before they sign.
Start a Conversation →Research sources
Explore adjacent topics
